The Hidden Rosary Beads and the Transfiguration
The Luminous Mysteries is a very new set of mysteries! And by very new, I mean that it was added to the official Rosary by St. Pope John Paul II in October 2002. It is so new that I have never been aware of a time without the Luminous Mysteries! (Mind you, I am a millennial, so this is probably somewhat expected, but still.)
The addition of this set of mysteries was actually pretty controversial, and some people still refuse to pray the Luminous Mysteries because of this controversy. After all, the original Rosary has a profound history — it is the Angelic Psalter which Our Lady gave St. Dominic! If the Rosary needed an addition, wouldn’t Our Lady have given it to St. Dominic?
So, it was with surprise that I found this artwork!
It is of the Transfiguration!
The bible describes the Transfiguration as such:
And so, in this picture you’ll see Jesus in white, along with Moses holding the tablets and Elijah in flames to signify his chariot of fire. Below are Christ’s disciples, including Peter, who is in the middle, John, who is to the left (John is traditionally portrayed without a beard!), and James, who is to the right.
It is a fairly typical icon in many respects… except for the bottom! Look closely at the bottom! You’ll see the donor, Johannes Göckerlein, who commissioned this piece to be a sort of coat of arms, on his knees praying, as so many donors did in these sorts of religious artworks that they commissioned. Now, look at his hands!
In his hands, there is a rosary!
Honestly, this was incredible to me. This painting was done in 1515. That is 487 years before St. Pope John Paul II suggested the Luminous Mysteries in his apostolic letter, Rosarium Virginis Mariae, in which he formally introduced the Luminous Mysteries.
This, of course, got me wondering… what was the history of the Luminous Mysteries? Were there any special devotions like the Luminous Mysteries back in the 16th century?
Well… it’s complicated.
First, it seems as if the Luminous Mysteries, as it formally is today, is a very recent development. And by early, I mean that it seems to have been developed in the late 19th or early 20th century before it was formally adopted.
And yet… it is not inconceivable that people used the beads of the Rosary to meditate on what we now acknowledge as the Luminous Mysteries. There are many chaplets that follow the form and style of the Rosary. Indeed, the format of the Rosary was based after the Psalter — a series of 150 psalms that were recited to glorify God.
Yet, it’s also very likely that he may have simply been meditating on the glory of God. After all, the Rosary is a beautiful prayer that connects us with God by allowing us to meditate on the life of Christ, from the very moment of Christ’s conception to the triumph of His Kingship. It allows us to reflect on the glory of God through the eyes of Mary.
And the Transfiguration is definitely an event that glorifies God! It is when Jesus shows His Divine Nature! In fact, Peter is so astonished by the Transfiguration that He suggests pitching a tent. Which, to us, might seem to be an odd time to think about camping. But to Peter, a tent was the place where the Ark of the Covenant — aka, the very essence of God — was stored under.
In art, the Transfiguration is also portrayed as a glorious event! Many times, pictures of the Ascension can be confused with images of the Transfiguration in Western Art. In Eastern art, the newer Resurrection icons are often based on Transfiguration icons.
And so, why would a man commission an artist to depict him kneeling down with a rosary in hand while gazing at the Transfiguration 487 years before the Luminous Mysteries were suggested?
Simple: to acknowledge the glory of God.
This blog is part of a blog series about the Luminous Mysteries. This artwork, as well as many others, are available in my book, The Luminous Mysteries, which allows you to pray the Rosary prayer by prayer, with each prayer illustrated with gorgeous religious art. If you would like to learn more about the books, click here!
3 thoughts on “The Hidden Rosary Beads and the Transfiguration”
Thank you for sharing these beautiful thoughts and insights. I do have a nagging question. Perhaps you could help me. Why do Catholic writers not use the Douay-Rheims Bible when quoting Biblical passages. It was the first Bible to be successfully translated into English, and is one hundred percent Catholic. If you have any insight that you could share, I would be very grateful. God bless and prosper the work you do for Him.
Thank you for your kind words! 🙂
Well! This is going to be a slightly silly answer from me, but the biggest reason why I don’t use the Douay-Rheims bible in my blogs is because I have a handy little Catholic bible app for my blog that lets me instantly quote scripture easily. And its only English translation in the app is the NABRE! (The developers are Italian, I think, so there are several Italian translations, but only one English translation.) So, thus the blogs are almost exclusively from the NABRE.
I actually really like the D-R bible and I use it in my books. It’s in the public domain so there’s no pesky copyright issues involved, it has lovely language, and it’s just… the standard English translation. It sometimes doesn’t line up very well with modern translations — some of the Psalms, for instance, can have different ordering for its verses, which drives me a bit loopy at times, admittedly. But, overall, I think it’s lovely!
Its language is definitely more antiquated though, and I am sure that causes many people to prefer the modern versions of the bible. I let several people read my books (which use the D-R version!) before I publish them to make sure they are well-laid out, and a lot of the comments that I get are those people saying, “Um… are you sure that isn’t a typo?” For instance! In the beginning of Acts 2, there is a line that goes, “…and they began to speak with divers tongues.” To which my readers said, “This must be a typo.” Yet, the word “divers” is a real word (albeit, an antiquated word) that is similar to “diverse” that has a slightly different meaning and emphasis on the word.
Anyway! That’s probably more than you ever wanted to know, but I hope that answers your question! 🙂 God bless!
Thank you for taking some of your valuable time to answer me. I deeply appreciate if. You answered exactly what I was asking. .
I think the other truly Catholic Bible is called the Jerome Bible. It was the one that Mother Angelica used (you don’t get much more Catholic than that!). She used the original version, but warned against an “improvement” made to the Bible by employing “inclusive” language. All the Bibles used now are Protestant Bibles with the material that Luther found unacceptable put back in as a concession to the ignorant, superstitious Catholics. The reason that Psalms is confusing is that Protestant “Biblical scholars” renumbered them. Therefore what you see in the Douay-Rheims as Psalm 22 is now Psalm 23 as an example.
Sorry, I do not mean to put you to sleep. Anyway, I know what a “gaol” is, and I know that the spelling is perfectly fine!
This is the first time I have read anything that you have written. I will be looking for your books now.
Again, thank you for your kind response. May the Good Lord bless and keep you. Merry Christmas to you and your family.